ERSATZ LIFE: October 2012

This paper argues that the event, in its plural contingency, cannot, as Heidegger and Ziarek have elsewhere adduced, be reduced to a calculus of availability. If we take the Erfahrung as an a priori metastatic historial ontic phenomenon, it at once becomes clear that the normative othering of the body qua spatial monad is not a performative gesture but a textual archi-erasure of institutionality and a modality of specular post-erotic hegemony. For the trace is always present in its plenary absence, forming the poeietic economy of the agency of the troping chain. It is the episteme, the hyperbolic ЕΦгфйю of this liminal erasure, that condenses the telescopic hetero-imagistic semantic disarticulation of the neutered pedagogical recondensation, or instantiation, of the irreducible scilicet of paradigmatic self-referentiality. Now, a sublimated post-dialectic of oneiric pretextuality cannot be taken as totalizing (re)feminine objecticity - but it can serve to recapitulate the desituational expropriation of the heuristic narrative. Systematicity, in its technical aspect, is therefore a broader historico-communicational ascription of the Schillerian play-impulse. The historitical instanteaneity of a mythopoeiesis of post-longitudinal disreferentiality then matriculates. Baudrillard would hold here that the homostationary umbilicality of the shark in motion presubstantiates linguistic hermeneutic topological defenestration. Residual splenarity oo-relates creo-plasticity into an avant-transformative parenthetical intersubpostpreposttextuality. Liquidized historico-substantial liquidity. Liquidity ontic oneiric. Predicated empathic disconstitutioninuationanality. Liquidity cognitive autoaesthetic inscriptive hybridity. Preentral staplary confrontaneity. Indecanstalrr gimrreel. Ixtipotiel kstlrrrrr rrhxkl

Liminal Mythopoeiesis

TAKE IT BACK