Liminal Mythopoeiesis
This paper argues that the event, in
its plural contingency, cannot, as Heidegger and Ziarek have
elsewhere adduced, be reduced to a calculus of availability. If we
take the Erfahrung as an a
priori metastatic historial ontic phenomenon, it at once becomes
clear that the normative othering of the body qua spatial
monad is not a performative gesture but a textual archi-erasure of
institutionality and a modality of specular post-erotic hegemony. For
the trace is always present in its plenary absence, forming the
poeietic economy of the agency of the troping chain. It is the
episteme, the hyperbolic ЕΦгфйю
of
this liminal erasure, that condenses the telescopic hetero-imagistic
semantic disarticulation of the neutered pedagogical recondensation,
or instantiation, of the irreducible scilicet
of
paradigmatic self-referentiality. Now, a sublimated post-dialectic of
oneiric pretextuality cannot be taken as totalizing (re)feminine
objecticity - but it can serve to recapitulate the desituational
expropriation of the heuristic narrative. Systematicity, in its
technical aspect, is therefore a broader historico-communicational
ascription of the Schillerian play-impulse. The historitical
instanteaneity of a mythopoeiesis of post-longitudinal
disreferentiality then matriculates. Baudrillard would hold here that
the homostationary umbilicality of the shark in motion
presubstantiates linguistic hermeneutic topological defenestration.
Residual splenarity oo-relates creo-plasticity into an
avant-transformative parenthetical intersubpostpreposttextuality.
Liquidized historico-substantial liquidity. Liquidity ontic oneiric.
Predicated empathic disconstitutioninuationanality. Liquidity
cognitive autoaesthetic inscriptive hybridity. Preentral staplary
confrontaneity. Indecanstalrr gimrreel. Ixtipotiel kstlrrrrr rrhxkl
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Though defenestration is, in a manner of speaking, the best word in the English language, in my opinion, I find your obfuscation of the integral meaning of the piece in question-e.g. Liminal Mythopoeiesis-so forceful in nature and, as it were, efficacious, that any and all point or, as they say, reason behind the morpheme conglomerate cannot be determined even by the most assiduous or meticulous of eyes.
ReplyDeleteYou clearly fail to take away the key meaning of this passage - namely, that a poetics of the event cannot desubstantiate the post-liminal categorical aesthetics of economical selectivity. This would become clear to you at once, were you simply willing to de-automotize the technic modality of being and allow the phenomenal unfolding of reality to occur objectively.
ReplyDelete